DESIGN-BID-BUILD

Design-Bid-Build is the most traditional project delivery method that we offer. With this method, the owner hires an architect who completes the design and, after bidding, hires a contractor who completes construction. When the design phase is complete, contractors bid on the construction cost.  After receiving bids, the architect will counsel the owner through the decision and the owner will select the contractor who offers the lowest responsive, responsible bid.

Pros & Cons

In theory, the method should lower construction costs by promoting competition between contractors. Although the method may help to reduce costs, it can be risky for owners. Some contractors may be tempted to offer the lowest possible bid and seek out low-cost subcontractors and materials, diminishing the quality of work. At the same time, there is no opportunity for architects and contractors to collaborate when developing the scope of the work.  If the project has a high degree of scope uncertainty or if changes to scope are likely to occur during construction, the owner should strongly consider utilizing an alternative delivery method.

As such, all drawings and specifications produced by architects and engineers need to be produced with a high-level of detail before the project goes out to bid. The more detailed the drawings and specifications, the more likely the completed project will reflect the design intent and align with the schedule and budget.  Patel & Milewski has executed a number of projects utilizing this delivery method. While this is still the most popular contract delivery method, its relative popularity is decreasing as the industry matures.